Difference between revisions of "Eosinophilic esophagitis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Comment) |
m (→Report: Comment) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{|class=wikitable | {|class=wikitable | ||
| − | | (Esophagus, biopsy:)<br>Squamous mucosa with increased intraepithelial eosinophils of up to 15/HPF. See comment. | + | | (Esophagus, biopsy:)<br>Squamous mucosa with increased intraepithelial eosinophils of up to 15/HPF. See comment.<br>...<br> |
| − | |||
''Comment: There is no evidence of eosinophilic microabscesses. Although this may represent reflux esophagitis, a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is considered in the correct clinical setting.'' | ''Comment: There is no evidence of eosinophilic microabscesses. Although this may represent reflux esophagitis, a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is considered in the correct clinical setting.'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Bottom}} | {{Bottom}} | ||
Revision as of 15:10, 1 December 2020
Author:
Mikael Häggström [note 1]
Microscopic diagnosis
It is characterized by a prominent eosinophilic infiltrate in the esophagus, with consensus guidelines defining it as over 15 eosinophils per HPF.[1]
Report
- If positive:
- Presence of eosinophilic esophagitis
- Number of eosinophils per HPF
In borderline cases, such as an incidental finding of eosinophils at around 15/HPF, a separate explanatory comment can be made, such as:
| (Esophagus, biopsy:) Squamous mucosa with increased intraepithelial eosinophils of up to 15/HPF. See comment. ... Comment: There is no evidence of eosinophilic microabscesses. Although this may represent reflux esophagitis, a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is considered in the correct clinical setting. |
Notes
- ↑ For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Patholines:Authorship for details.
Main page
References
Image sources
