Hernia sac - Revision history

Mikael Häggström: /* Microscopic report */ +Image

2023-11-17T19:46:13Z

Microscopic report: +Image

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 17 November 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==Microscopic report==		==Microscopic report==
			[[File:Histology of the mesothelial lining of a hernia sac.jpg\|thumb\|290px\|Mesothelial lining of a hernia sac.]]
	In case of a '''gross only examination''', the microscopic report may still be given as a formality:		In case of a '''gross only examination''', the microscopic report may still be given as a formality:
	{\|class=wikitable		{\|class=wikitable

Mikael Häggström: /* Microscopic report */ Example

2022-02-02T18:41:15Z

Microscopic report: Example

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 2 February 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|}		\|}

	When microscopy slides of the case are available:		When microscopy slides of the case are available, you may screen the sample at low magnification to rule out obvious pathology:
	{\| Umbilical hernia sac, hernia repair:<br>Connective tissue lined by mesothelium, consistent with hernia sac.		{\|class=wikitable
			\|Umbilical hernia sac, hernia repair:<br>Connective tissue lined by mesothelium, consistent with hernia sac.
	\|}		\|}
	{{Bottom}}		{{Bottom}}

Mikael Häggström: /* Gross processing */ end

2022-02-02T18:39:18Z

Gross processing: end

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 2 February 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	{{Fixation - standard}}		{{Fixation - standard}}
	==Gross processing==		==Gross processing==
	A gross inspection is almost always enough, and tissue generally does not need to be submitted except in unique circumstances.<ref name="pmid25725504">{{cite journal\| author=Chesley PM, Black GE, Martin MJ, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Steele SR\| title=The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens. \| journal=Am J Surg \| year= 2015 \| volume= 209 \| issue= 5 \| pages= 783-6; discussion 786 \| pmid=25725504 \| doi=10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.019 \| pmc= \| url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25725504 }} </ref> {{Comprehensive-begin}}Still you may submit 1 cassette of one or more representative sections for an inguinal hernia sac in a patient aged up to 16 years of age, or in case of hernia sacs from other regions than inguinal.		A gross inspection is almost always enough, and tissue generally does not need to be submitted except in unique circumstances.<ref name="pmid25725504">{{cite journal\| author=Chesley PM, Black GE, Martin MJ, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Steele SR\| title=The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens. \| journal=Am J Surg \| year= 2015 \| volume= 209 \| issue= 5 \| pages= 783-6; discussion 786 \| pmid=25725504 \| doi=10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.019 \| pmc= \| url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25725504 }} </ref> {{Comprehensive-begin}}Still you may submit 1 cassette of one or more representative sections for an inguinal hernia sac in a patient aged up to 16 years of age, or in case of hernia sacs from other regions than inguinal.{{Comprehensive-end}}

	;Gross report		;Gross report

Mikael Häggström: Expanded

2022-02-02T18:35:25Z

Expanded

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 2 February 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	}}		}}
	[[File:Gross pathology of hernia sac.jpg\|thumb\|Gross pathology of a hernia sac.]]		[[File:Gross pathology of hernia sac.jpg\|thumb\|Gross pathology of a hernia sac.]]
			{{Comprehensiveness}}
	{{Fixation - standard}}		{{Fixation - standard}}
	==Gross processing==		==Gross processing==
	~~Generally~~ submit 1 cassette of representative sections~~, but this is not necessary in~~ an inguinal hernia sac in a patient aged ~~over~~ 16 years.		A gross inspection is almost always enough, and tissue generally does not need to be submitted except in unique circumstances.<ref name="pmid25725504">{{cite journal\| author=Chesley PM, Black GE, Martin MJ, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Steele SR\| title=The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens. \| journal=Am J Surg \| year= 2015 \| volume= 209 \| issue= 5 \| pages= 783-6; discussion 786 \| pmid=25725504 \| doi=10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.019 \| pmc= \| url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25725504 }} </ref> {{Comprehensive-begin}}Still you may submit 1 cassette of one or more representative sections for an inguinal hernia sac in a patient aged up to 16 years of age, or in case of hernia sacs from other regions than inguinal.

	;Gross report		;Gross report
			{{Grossreport-begin}} __ fragment(s) of pink-tan fibromembranous tissue, measuring ___ cm in greatest dimension and ___ cm in greatest thickness. The surfaces are smooth. There are no sections submitted for microscopic examination.{{Grossreport-end}}

			==Microscopic report==
			In case of a '''gross only examination''', the microscopic report may still be given as a formality:
	{\|class=wikitable		{\|class=wikitable
	\| ~~(A. Labeled - [ ]~~. ~~The specimen is received in formalin and consists~~ of~~) __ fragment(s) of pink-tan fibromembranous~~ tissue, ~~measuring ___ cm in greatest dimension and ___ cm in greatest thickness. The surfaces are smooth. There are no sections submitted for microscopic examination~~.		\| Right inguinal region, herniorrhaphy:<br>Hernia sac, gross examination only.
			\|}

			When microscopy slides of the case are available:
			{\| Umbilical hernia sac, hernia repair:<br>Connective tissue lined by mesothelium, consistent with hernia sac.
	\|}		\|}
	{{Bottom}}		{{Bottom}}

Mikael Häggström: /* Gross processing */ Format

2020-11-23T19:26:52Z

Gross processing: Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 23 November 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:

	;Gross report		;Gross report
	{\|class=wikitable}		{\|class=wikitable
	\| (A. Labeled - [ ]. The specimen is received in formalin and consists of) __ fragment(s) of pink-tan fibromembranous tissue, measuring ___ cm in greatest dimension and ___ cm in greatest thickness. The surfaces are smooth. There are no sections submitted for microscopic examination.		\| (A. Labeled - [ ]. The specimen is received in formalin and consists of) __ fragment(s) of pink-tan fibromembranous tissue, measuring ___ cm in greatest dimension and ___ cm in greatest thickness. The surfaces are smooth. There are no sections submitted for microscopic examination.
	\|}		\|}
	{{Bottom}}		{{Bottom}}

Mikael Häggström: Started

2020-11-23T19:26:36Z

Started

New page

{{Top
|author1=[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]]
|author2=
}}
[[File:Gross pathology of hernia sac.jpg|thumb|Gross pathology of a hernia sac.]]
{{Fixation - standard}}
==Gross processing==
Generally submit 1 cassette of representative sections, but this is not necessary in an inguinal hernia sac in a patient aged over 16 years.

;Gross report
{|class=wikitable}
| (A. Labeled - [ ]. The specimen is received in formalin and consists of) __ fragment(s) of pink-tan fibromembranous tissue, measuring ___ cm in greatest dimension and ___ cm in greatest thickness. The surfaces are smooth. There are no sections submitted for microscopic examination.
|}
{{Bottom}}