Template:Autopsy - comprehensiveness - Revision history

Mikael Häggström: Example

2020-11-02T20:09:41Z

Example

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 2 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{#if: {{{subsection\|}}}		<includeonly>{{#if: {{{subsection\|}}}
	\|		\|
	===Comprehensiveness===		===Comprehensiveness===
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<br>{{Finding-begin}}Common findings / In case of findings{{Finding-end}}		<br>{{Finding-begin}}Common findings / In case of findings{{Finding-end}}
	<br>{{Comment-begin}}Comments{{Comment-end}}		<br>{{Comment-begin}}Comments{{Comment-end}}
	<br>'''Organs''' or '''important regions''' are in bold in the report example, but does not need to be in an actual report.\| }}		<br>'''Organs''' or '''important regions''' are in bold in the report example, but does not need to be in an actual report.\| }}</includeonly><noinclude>
			;Example:
			<nowiki>{{Autopsy - comprehensiveness\|subsection=yes\|otherlegend=yes}}</nowiki>

			;This yields:
			{{Autopsy - comprehensiveness\|subsection=yes\|otherlegend=yes}}
			</noinclude>

Mikael Häggström: Noheader

2020-09-10T22:20:07Z

Noheader

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 10 September 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.		*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
	*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.		*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.
	{{Comprehensiveness}} {{#if: {{{otherlegend\|}}}		{{Comprehensiveness\|noheader=yes}} {{#if: {{{otherlegend\|}}}
	\|		\|
	;Other legend:		;Other legend:

Mikael Häggström: +otherlegend

2020-08-07T20:16:56Z

+otherlegend

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 7 August 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.		*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
	*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.		*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.
	{{Comprehensiveness\|~~otherlegend=yes~~}}		{{Comprehensiveness}} {{#if: {{{otherlegend\|}}}
			\|
			;Other legend:
			<< Decision needed between alternatives separated by / signs >>
			<br>{{Finding-begin}}Common findings / In case of findings{{Finding-end}}
			<br>{{Comment-begin}}Comments{{Comment-end}}
			<br>'''Organs''' or '''important regions''' are in bold in the report example, but does not need to be in an actual report.\| }}

Mikael Häggström: otherlegend

2020-08-07T20:13:36Z

otherlegend

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 7 August 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.		*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
	*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.		*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.
	{{Comprehensiveness}}		{{Comprehensiveness\|otherlegend=yes}}

Mikael Häggström: +Comprehensiveness

2019-12-30T16:01:11Z

+Comprehensiveness

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 30 December 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.		*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
	*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.		*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.
			{{Comprehensiveness}}
	~~In this page, the following signs and text coloring are used:~~
	*Minimal depth
	*<font color="red">(Moderate depth)</font>
	*<font color="blue">((Comprehensive))</font>

Mikael Häggström: Fixed

2019-12-19T12:36:53Z

Fixed

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 19 December 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Comprehensiveness==		==Comprehensiveness==
	}}		}}

	~~==Comprehensiveness==~~
	Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:		Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:
	*Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. On the other hand, for example, upon finding an obvious aortic rupture, the rest of the autopsy is less relevant and may be relatively short.		*Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. On the other hand, for example, upon finding an obvious aortic rupture, the rest of the autopsy is less relevant and may be relatively short.

Mikael Häggström: formatting

2019-12-19T12:36:41Z

formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 19 December 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{if\|{{{subsection\|}}}		{{#if: {{{subsection\|}}}
	\|		\|
	===Comprehensiveness===		===Comprehensiveness===
	\|		\|
	==Comprehensiveness==		==Comprehensiveness==
	\|
	}}		}}

	==Comprehensiveness==		==Comprehensiveness==
	Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:		Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:

Mikael Häggström: spaced

2019-12-19T12:32:08Z

spaced

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 19 December 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{if\|{{{subsection\|}}}		{{if\|{{{subsection\|}}}
	\|===Comprehensiveness===\|==Comprehensiveness==\|		\|
			===Comprehensiveness===
			\|
			==Comprehensiveness==
			\|
	}}		}}
	==Comprehensiveness==		==Comprehensiveness==

Mikael Häggström: Type

2019-12-19T12:31:51Z

Type

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 19 December 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{if\|{{{subsection\|}}}
			\|===Comprehensiveness===\|==Comprehensiveness==\|
			}}
	==Comprehensiveness==		==Comprehensiveness==
	Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:		Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:

Mikael Häggström: Templated

2019-12-19T12:29:09Z

Templated

New page

==Comprehensiveness==
Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:
*Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. On the other hand, for example, upon finding an obvious aortic rupture, the rest of the autopsy is less relevant and may be relatively short.
*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
*Highly '''suspected''' locations, such as given from the referral.

In this page, the following signs and text coloring are used:
*Minimal depth
*<font color="red">(Moderate depth)</font>
*<font color="blue">((Comprehensive))</font>