Evaluation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mikael Häggström (talk | contribs)
Priority: Expanded
Mikael Häggström (talk | contribs)
Noted
Line 19: Line 19:


==Priority==
==Priority==
Whenever you have more than one case, generally have an initial '''quick look''' at the requisition form and/or in the microscope at the most likely relevant area of each case, and prioritize the case(s) that likely need to be done first. Indications to prioritize case(s) are mainly:
Whenever you have more than one case, generally have an '''initial look''' at the requisition form and/or in the microscope at the most likely relevant area of each case, and prioritize the case(s) that likely need to be done first. Indications to prioritize case(s) are mainly:
* '''Clinical management''' of the patient highly benefits from a fast diagnosis.
* '''Clinical management''' of the patient highly benefits from a fast diagnosis.
* Being '''marked''' as a rush case.
* Being '''marked''' as a rush case.
* There's a significant probability that it will require '''further workup''' such as [[immunohistochemistry]], especially when there is an impending deadline for ordering it.
* There's a significant probability that it will require '''further workup''' such as [[immunohistochemistry]], especially when there is an impending deadline for ordering it.
* The optimal person to ask for '''advice''' may not be available later.
* The optimal person to ask for '''advice''' may not be available later.
For a pile of many cases of relatively low risk of a need to prioritize any one over another, such as [[gastrointestinal biopsies]], a very quick glance at the forms and/or a naked eye look at the glass slides is generally acceptable.


==Main steps==
==Main steps==