Dermatitis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Expanded |
Expanded |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Non vesicullobullous, non-pustular lesions without epidermal changes | ===Non vesicullobullous, non-pustular lesions without epidermal changes=== | ||
====Lymphocytic infiltrate==== | |||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
! Main conditions<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> !! Characteristics !! Image | ! Main conditions<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> !! Characteristics !! Image | ||
| Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
| A lesion with superficial lymphocytic infiltrate without additional histopathologic characteristics can be due to for example drug reactions and insect bites.<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> | | A lesion with superficial lymphocytic infiltrate without additional histopathologic characteristics can be due to for example drug reactions and insect bites.<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> | ||
|} | |} | ||
====Lymphoeosinophilic infiltrate==== | |||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
! Main conditions<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> !! Characteristics !! Image | |||
|- | |||
! Urticaria, lymphocyte predominant | |||
| Perivascular location. Mast cells are relatively sparse, potentially demonstrated with special stains, preferably tryptase stain. Extravasated erythrocytes are present in about 50% of the cases. No vasculitis.<ref name="BarzilaiSagi2017"/> | |||
| [[File:Micrograph of urticaria.jpg|190px]] Dermal edema (solid arrows) and a sparse superficial predominantly perivascular and interstitial infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (dashed arrow) | |||
|- | |||
! Prevesicular stage of bullous pemphigoid | |||
| Image at right shows influx of inflammatory cells including eosinophils and neutrophils in the dermis (solid arrow) and blister cavity (dashed arrows), and deposition of fibrin (asterisks).<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Giang|first1=Jenny|last2=Seelen|first2=Marc A. J.|last3=van Doorn|first3=Martijn B. A.|last4=Rissmann|first4=Robert|last5=Prens|first5=Errol P.|last6=Damman|first6=Jeffrey|title=Complement Activation in Inflammatory Skin Diseases|journal=Frontiers in Immunology|volume=9|year=2018|issn=1664-3224|doi=10.3389/fimmu.2018.00639}}</ref> However, the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid consist of at least 2 positive results out of 3 criteria:<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Meijer JM, Diercks GF, de Lang EW, Pas HH, Jonkman MF | title = Assessment of diagnostic strategy for early recognition of bullous and nonbullous variants of pemphigoid. | journal = JAMA Dermatol | volume = 155 | issue = 2 | pages = 158–165 | doi = 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4390 | pmid = 30624575 | pmc = 6439538 | date = December 2018 }}</ref> | |||
*Pruritus and/or predominant cutaneous blisters | |||
*Linear IgG and/or C3c deposits (in an n- serrated pattern) by direct [[immunofluorescence]] microscopy (DIF) | |||
*Positive epidermal side staining by [[indirect immunofluorescence]] microscopy on human salt-split skin (IIF SSS) on a serum sample. | |||
| [[File:Micrograph of infiltrate in bullous pemphigoid.jpg|thumb| | |||
|- | |||
! Not otherwise specified | |||
| A lesion with superficial lymphocytic infiltrate without additional histopathologic characteristics can be due to for example drug reactions and insect bites.<ref name="Alsaad2005"/> | |||
{{Bottom}} | {{Bottom}} | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 5 November 2019
Author:
Mikael Häggström [note 1]
Sampling
- For punch biopsies, a size of 4 mm is preferred for most inflammatory dermatoses.[1]
- Panniculitis or cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders: 6 mm punch biopsy or skin excision.[1]
A superficial or shave biopsy is regarded as insufficient.[1]
Fixation
- Generally: Buffered 4% formaldehyde.[2]
- Suspected immunologic disease:[3] Fixation for immunofluorescence, with for example Michel's solution.[2] For details, see immunofluorescense of skin tissues
Staining
3 H&E sections and one section with periodic acid Schiff (PAS)[notes 1][1]
- If suspected bacterial and fungal microorganisms, consider Gram stain and Gomori methenamine silver stain.[1]
Microscopic evaluation
One approach is to classify into mainly either of the following, primarily based on depth of involvement:[1]
- Epidermis, papillary dermis, and superficial vascular plexus:
- Vesiculobullous lesions
- Pustular dermatosis
- Non vesicullobullous, non-pustular
- With epidermal changes
- Without epidermal changes. These characteristically have a superficial perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, and can be classified by type of cell infiltrate:[1]
- Lymphocytic (most common)
- Lymphoeosinophilic
- Lymphoplasmacytic
- Mast cell
- Lymphohistiocytic
- Neutrophilic
Continue in corresponding section:
Non vesicullobullous, non-pustular lesions with epidermal changes
| Main types[1] | Characteristics | Image |
|---|---|---|
| Spongiotic dermatitis | ||
| Interface dermatitis | ||
| Psoriaform dermatitis |
Non vesicullobullous, non-pustular lesions without epidermal changes
Lymphocytic infiltrate
| Main conditions[1] | Characteristics | Image |
|---|---|---|
| Urticaria, lymphocyte predominant | Perivascular location. Mast cells are relatively sparse, potentially demonstrated with special stains, preferably tryptase stain. Extravasated erythrocytes are present in about 50% of the cases. No vasculitis.[4] | |
| Fungal skin infection | Visible fungus. Other signs depend on fungus species.[5] | |
| Pigmented purpuric dermatosis |
|
File:Histopathology of Schamberg disease.jpg |
| Erythema annulare centrifugum |
Deep lesions: Sharply demarcated perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate in middle to deep dermis[7] |
File:Micrograph of erythema annulare centrifugum.jpg |
| Not otherwise specified | A lesion with superficial lymphocytic infiltrate without additional histopathologic characteristics can be due to for example drug reactions and insect bites.[1] |
Lymphoeosinophilic infiltrate
| Main conditions[1] | Characteristics | Image |
|---|---|---|
| Urticaria, lymphocyte predominant | Perivascular location. Mast cells are relatively sparse, potentially demonstrated with special stains, preferably tryptase stain. Extravasated erythrocytes are present in about 50% of the cases. No vasculitis.[4] | File:Micrograph of urticaria.jpg Dermal edema (solid arrows) and a sparse superficial predominantly perivascular and interstitial infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (dashed arrow) |
| Prevesicular stage of bullous pemphigoid | Image at right shows influx of inflammatory cells including eosinophils and neutrophils in the dermis (solid arrow) and blister cavity (dashed arrows), and deposition of fibrin (asterisks).[8] However, the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid consist of at least 2 positive results out of 3 criteria:[9]
|
[[File:Micrograph of infiltrate in bullous pemphigoid.jpg|thumb| |
| Not otherwise specified | A lesion with superficial lymphocytic infiltrate without additional histopathologic characteristics can be due to for example drug reactions and insect bites.[1]
Notes
Main pageReferences
Image sources
|