Difference between revisions of "Evaluation of suspected malignancies"
(→Radicality: Radicality) |
(→Squamoid tumors: +differential) |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|author2= | |author2= | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | For [[evaluation]] of '''suspected malignancies''' such as '''tumors''', the most important aspect is whether it is benign or malignant. If malignant, then staging is necessary.<ref name=cancer>{{cite web |url= http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/detection/staging |title=Cancer staging |date= |publisher=National Cancer Institute |accessdate=4 January 2013}}</ref> There are generally specific criteria for various forms of tumors, which should be used whenever applicable, but following are some generalizations. | |
− | For [[evaluation]] of suspected malignancies, the most important | ||
A general approach is to start looking at the slide which seems to contain most tumor (excluding any necrosis), facilitating a diagnosis, and shows what kind of cells to look for in the periphery. | A general approach is to start looking at the slide which seems to contain most tumor (excluding any necrosis), facilitating a diagnosis, and shows what kind of cells to look for in the periphery. | ||
==Benign or malignant== | ==Benign or malignant== | ||
+ | [[File:Normal and cancer cells structure.jpg|thumb|Cellular features of malignant cells versus normal cells.]] | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
! !! Benign<ref name=amboss>{{cite web|url=https://www.amboss.com/us/knowledge/General_oncology|title=General oncology|website=Amboss|accessdate=2020-01-29}}</ref> !! Malignant<ref name=amboss/> | ! !! Benign<ref name=amboss>{{cite web|url=https://www.amboss.com/us/knowledge/General_oncology|title=General oncology|website=Amboss|accessdate=2020-01-29}}</ref> !! Malignant<ref name=amboss/> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*Numerous mitotic figures | *Numerous mitotic figures | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Overall diagnosis=== | ||
+ | For specific diagnoses by organ system, see anatomic diagram on Patholines '''[[Main page]]'''. This resource will give the main steps towards reaching a diagnosis, but before making a tumor diagnosis, always confirm with [https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours The WHO Classification of tumors], and generally an experienced pathologist as well until you feel confident. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Visually, tumors and other suspected malignancies can usually be classified into one of the following groups: | ||
+ | <gallery mode=packed heights=220> | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of endometrioid cancer, grade 1, nuclear grade 2.jpg|'''Gland-like tumors''', with tumor cells around clearings | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung.jpg|'''Squamoid tumors''', typically having abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm.<ref name="pmid32316685">{{cite journal| author=Choi JH, Ro JY| title=Epithelioid Cutaneous Mesenchymal Neoplasms: A Practical Diagnostic Approach. | journal=Diagnostics (Basel) | year= 2020 | volume= 10 | issue= 4 | pages= | pmid=32316685 | doi=10.3390/diagnostics10040233 | pmc=7236000 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=32316685 }} </ref> | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of an ovarian fibroma.jpg|'''Spindle-cell tumors''', with elongated cells and/or nuclei | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of Merkel-cell carcinoma with undifferentiated tumor cells.png|'''Undifferentiated tumors''', with few to no visual clues to their origin. | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Further pinpointing of a specific tumor type is often attained by thinking of one or more possible diagnoses, and looking up their '''differential diagnoses''', followed by comparing their microscopic descriptions and multiple micrographs with the case at hand. When two or more diagnoses seem to fit with the case at hand, consider performing '''immunohistochemistry'''. Find relevant target proteins that are expected to stain substantially differently between the possible diagnoses. If it's not evident from initial sources, you may use Immunoquery.com which will generally suggest the most relevant target proteins to distinguish the suspected conditions at hand. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Gland-like tumors==== | ||
+ | Gland-like tumors are mainly evaluated for cellular atypia, architectural dysplasia and invasion, and thereby classified into the following main categories: | ||
+ | *'''Hyperplastic''' lesions, lacking significant atypia | ||
+ | *'''Adenomas''', which can range from mild to high-grade dysplastic, yet are generally confined within their anatomic layers, that is, they are not invasive. | ||
+ | *'''Adenocarcinomas''', with the main criterion being invasiveness. Evaluate specifically by location when possible. Some specific locations included in this resource: | ||
+ | :*[[Colorectal adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | :*[[Prostate adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | :*[[Lung adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | :*[[Bladder adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | :*[[Esophageal adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | :*[[Endometrial adenocarcinoma]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Squamoid tumors==== | ||
+ | These are more or less looking like a '''[[squamous-cell carcinoma]]''': | ||
+ | <gallery mode=packed heights=220> | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of squamous-cell carcinoma.png|Main characteristics of squamous-cell carcinoma | ||
+ | File:Histopathology of invasive squamous cell carcinoma.jpg|Typical well-differentiated nests have cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Keratinizing centers are seen as well. | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | Differential diagnoses depend on location, such as: | ||
+ | *'''[[Squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin]]''', with '''[[Template:Squamous-cell like skin proliferations - differential diagnosis|multiple differential diagnoses]]''' | ||
+ | *'''[[Squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung]]''' | ||
+ | *Urinary bladder: '''[[Urothelial versus squamous-cell carcinoma]]''' | ||
+ | *Cervix uteri: '''[[Cervical dysplasia]]''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Spindle-cell tumors==== | ||
+ | For '''Spindle-cell tumors''', the shape of the nuclei is a clue to the diagnosis, with the following tendency: | ||
+ | *Pointed on both ends: True fibroblastic tumors | ||
+ | *Pointed on one end and blunted on the other ("bullet-shaped"): Neural | ||
+ | *Blunted on both ends ("cigar-shaped"): Smooth muscle | ||
+ | *Triangular: Myofibroblastic | ||
+ | Evaluate specifically by location when possible, such as [[spindle-cell tumors of the midgut]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Undifferentiated tumor==== | ||
+ | An initial panel of cytokeratin (CK), S100, vimentin and LCA (CD45) can be used.<ref name="pmid25427040">{{cite journal| author=Lin F, Liu H| title=Immunohistochemistry in undifferentiated neoplasm/tumor of uncertain origin. | journal=Arch Pathol Lab Med | year= 2014 | volume= 138 | issue= 12 | pages= 1583-610 | pmid=25427040 | doi=10.5858/arpa.2014-0061-RA | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25427040 }} </ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====No tumor==== | ||
+ | If a '''neoplasm has been ruled out''' for what clinically appeared like a tumor, seek a diagnosis that can be consistent with such a clinical finding. For example, for a breast biopsy of what appeared to look like a mass, and there is no neoplasia, look mainly for dense fibrosis, so that you can report that thereby explain the finding, rather than merely write "benign breast tissue". | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Additional levels or slices== | ||
+ | Additional material is indicated in the following situations: | ||
+ | *Re-excision does not identify tumor cells in a clearly non-radical primary excision or biopsy. | ||
+ | *The most aggressive pattern is seen in the last available section, in which case more sections are indicated (from the same paraffin block if additional tissue is not available). | ||
+ | Depending on availability and greatest suspicion, additional material is either acquired by taking addition step sections of remaining tissue in a paraffin block, or taking additional slices from the original specimen. | ||
==Staging== | ==Staging== | ||
− | Staging is generally done by TNM classification. Specific TNM systems should be used, | + | Staging is generally done by TNM classification. Specific TNM systems should be used whenever applicable, mainly the manual by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) if you can access it. {{further|Secrets}}<noinclude>.</noinclude> Otherwise, a general system may be used:<ref name=cancer/> |
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
| | | | ||
Line 50: | Line 107: | ||
** M1: metastasis to distant organs (beyond regional lymph nodes) | ** M1: metastasis to distant organs (beyond regional lymph nodes) | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Put your main '''focus''' on features that will determine the final stage. For example, if you see a lymph node involved by cancer, the presence or absence of lymphatic invasion is no longer critical, but rather the presence or absence of additional involved nodes or distant metastasis. | ||
==Radicality== | ==Radicality== | ||
[[File:Histopathology of radically excised basal-cell carcinoma with separation artifact.jpg|thumb|250px|If tumor is seen at edge of the sample, but it is not inked, consider confirming the finding with adjacent microtomy levels, especially if no ink is seen on an inked surgical margin. In this case, a separation artifact in top image has removed a surgical margin of connective tissue, seen on adjacent microtomy section in bottom image.]] | [[File:Histopathology of radically excised basal-cell carcinoma with separation artifact.jpg|thumb|250px|If tumor is seen at edge of the sample, but it is not inked, consider confirming the finding with adjacent microtomy levels, especially if no ink is seen on an inked surgical margin. In this case, a separation artifact in top image has removed a surgical margin of connective tissue, seen on adjacent microtomy section in bottom image.]] | ||
Determine if malignant cells are located close to, or even in, any surgical resection margins. | Determine if malignant cells are located close to, or even in, any surgical resection margins. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Lymphovascular invasion== | ||
+ | Lymphovascular invasion should always be mentioned. When present at margins, it does ''not'' count as tumor extension. | ||
<gallery mode=packed> | <gallery mode=packed> | ||
− | File:Histopathology of endometrial cancer with lymphovascular invasion.jpg| | + | File:Histopathology of endometrial cancer with lymphovascular invasion.jpg|Endometrial cancer with lymphovascular invasion. |
+ | File:Histopathology of typical micropapillary urothelial carcinoma infiltrating the lamina propria - crop.jpg|If unsure whether a case is true lymphovascular invasion or a retraction artifact (imaged), use immunohistochemistry for D2-40 to highlight lymphatic vessels or CD-31 for blood vessels. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==Typing and grading== | ==Typing and grading== | ||
− | [[File:Histopathology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with treatment effect.jpg|thumb|Also note "treatment effect", seen as | + | [[File:Histopathology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with treatment effect.jpg|thumb|Also note "treatment effect", seen as fibroelastotic tissue, here with scattered remaining tumor cells.]] |
− | Beyond determining overall malignancy, probable origin and staging, classification of tumors into a specific histopathologic type or grade is generally of relatively less value. In cases of clearly non-malignant tumors where it is difficult to determine the specific histopathologic type or grade, it is generally acceptable to conclude the evaluation and report it as such, unless the clinician specifically requests otherwise. For potentially malignant or high-risk tumors, typing and grading often still affects the management | + | Beyond determining overall malignancy diagnosis (such as adenocarcinoma), probable origin and staging, classification of tumors into a specific histopathologic type or grade is generally of relatively less value. In cases of clearly non-malignant tumors where it is difficult to determine the specific histopathologic type or grade, it is generally acceptable to conclude the evaluation and report it as such, unless the clinician specifically requests otherwise. For potentially malignant or high-risk tumors, typing and grading often still affects the management. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Reporting== | ==Reporting== | ||
{{CAP}} | {{CAP}} | ||
+ | If a surgery produces a specimen with cancer, as well as re-excisions from certain directions, you should preferably give the closest distance to margins in each specimen, as well as the closest distance overall in a synoptic, for example: | ||
+ | {|class=wikitable | ||
+ | | '''A. (Specimen with most of the cancer)''' | ||
+ | *(...) | ||
+ | *Invasive carcinoma is present at inked medial margin (see specimen B for final medial margin), and is located 0.3 cm from the lateral margin. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''B. (Re-excision in the direction of the medial margin)''' | ||
+ | *(...) | ||
+ | *Invasive carcinoma is located 0.5 cm from the new medial margin. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Synoptic report''' | ||
+ | *(...) | ||
+ | *Distance from invasive carcinoma to closest margin: 0.3 cm | ||
+ | *Closest margin(s) to invasive carcinoma: Lateral | ||
+ | |} | ||
{{Reporting}} | {{Reporting}} | ||
+ | <noinclude> | ||
+ | {{General notes}} | ||
{{Bottom}} | {{Bottom}} | ||
+ | </noinclude> |
Revision as of 09:00, 17 May 2022
Author:
Mikael Häggström [note 1]
For evaluation of suspected malignancies such as tumors, the most important aspect is whether it is benign or malignant. If malignant, then staging is necessary.[1] There are generally specific criteria for various forms of tumors, which should be used whenever applicable, but following are some generalizations.
A general approach is to start looking at the slide which seems to contain most tumor (excluding any necrosis), facilitating a diagnosis, and shows what kind of cells to look for in the periphery.
Contents
Benign or malignant
Benign[2] | Malignant[2] | |
---|---|---|
Gross examination |
|
Possibly:
|
Microscopy | Almost no irregularities of cellular structures | Nuclear atypia:
|
Overall diagnosis
For specific diagnoses by organ system, see anatomic diagram on Patholines Main page. This resource will give the main steps towards reaching a diagnosis, but before making a tumor diagnosis, always confirm with The WHO Classification of tumors, and generally an experienced pathologist as well until you feel confident.
Visually, tumors and other suspected malignancies can usually be classified into one of the following groups:
Squamoid tumors, typically having abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm.[3]
Further pinpointing of a specific tumor type is often attained by thinking of one or more possible diagnoses, and looking up their differential diagnoses, followed by comparing their microscopic descriptions and multiple micrographs with the case at hand. When two or more diagnoses seem to fit with the case at hand, consider performing immunohistochemistry. Find relevant target proteins that are expected to stain substantially differently between the possible diagnoses. If it's not evident from initial sources, you may use Immunoquery.com which will generally suggest the most relevant target proteins to distinguish the suspected conditions at hand.
Gland-like tumors
Gland-like tumors are mainly evaluated for cellular atypia, architectural dysplasia and invasion, and thereby classified into the following main categories:
- Hyperplastic lesions, lacking significant atypia
- Adenomas, which can range from mild to high-grade dysplastic, yet are generally confined within their anatomic layers, that is, they are not invasive.
- Adenocarcinomas, with the main criterion being invasiveness. Evaluate specifically by location when possible. Some specific locations included in this resource:
Squamoid tumors
These are more or less looking like a squamous-cell carcinoma:
Differential diagnoses depend on location, such as:
- Squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin, with multiple differential diagnoses
- Squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung
- Urinary bladder: Urothelial versus squamous-cell carcinoma
- Cervix uteri: Cervical dysplasia
Spindle-cell tumors
For Spindle-cell tumors, the shape of the nuclei is a clue to the diagnosis, with the following tendency:
- Pointed on both ends: True fibroblastic tumors
- Pointed on one end and blunted on the other ("bullet-shaped"): Neural
- Blunted on both ends ("cigar-shaped"): Smooth muscle
- Triangular: Myofibroblastic
Evaluate specifically by location when possible, such as spindle-cell tumors of the midgut.
Undifferentiated tumor
An initial panel of cytokeratin (CK), S100, vimentin and LCA (CD45) can be used.[4]
No tumor
If a neoplasm has been ruled out for what clinically appeared like a tumor, seek a diagnosis that can be consistent with such a clinical finding. For example, for a breast biopsy of what appeared to look like a mass, and there is no neoplasia, look mainly for dense fibrosis, so that you can report that thereby explain the finding, rather than merely write "benign breast tissue".
Additional levels or slices
Additional material is indicated in the following situations:
- Re-excision does not identify tumor cells in a clearly non-radical primary excision or biopsy.
- The most aggressive pattern is seen in the last available section, in which case more sections are indicated (from the same paraffin block if additional tissue is not available).
Depending on availability and greatest suspicion, additional material is either acquired by taking addition step sections of remaining tissue in a paraffin block, or taking additional slices from the original specimen.
Staging
Staging is generally done by TNM classification. Specific TNM systems should be used whenever applicable, mainly the manual by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) if you can access it. Further information: Secrets . Otherwise, a general system may be used:[1]
T: size or direct extent of the primary tumor
N: degree of spread to regional lymph nodes
M: presence of distant metastasis
|
Put your main focus on features that will determine the final stage. For example, if you see a lymph node involved by cancer, the presence or absence of lymphatic invasion is no longer critical, but rather the presence or absence of additional involved nodes or distant metastasis.
Radicality
Determine if malignant cells are located close to, or even in, any surgical resection margins.
Lymphovascular invasion
Lymphovascular invasion should always be mentioned. When present at margins, it does not count as tumor extension.
Typing and grading
Beyond determining overall malignancy diagnosis (such as adenocarcinoma), probable origin and staging, classification of tumors into a specific histopathologic type or grade is generally of relatively less value. In cases of clearly non-malignant tumors where it is difficult to determine the specific histopathologic type or grade, it is generally acceptable to conclude the evaluation and report it as such, unless the clinician specifically requests otherwise. For potentially malignant or high-risk tumors, typing and grading often still affects the management.
Reporting
For cancers, generally include a synoptic report, such as per College of American Pathologists (CAP) protocols at cap.org/protocols-and-guidelines. If a surgery produces a specimen with cancer, as well as re-excisions from certain directions, you should preferably give the closest distance to margins in each specimen, as well as the closest distance overall in a synoptic, for example:
A. (Specimen with most of the cancer)
B. (Re-excision in the direction of the medial margin)
Synoptic report
|
See also: General notes on reporting
Further reading: |
Notes
- ↑ For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Patholines:Authorship for details.
Main page
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 . Cancer staging. National Cancer Institute. Retrieved on 4 January 2013.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 . General oncology. Amboss. Retrieved on 2020-01-29.
- ↑ Choi JH, Ro JY (2020). "Epithelioid Cutaneous Mesenchymal Neoplasms: A Practical Diagnostic Approach. ". Diagnostics (Basel) 10 (4). doi: . PMID 32316685. PMC: 7236000. Archived from the original. .
- ↑ Lin F, Liu H (2014). "Immunohistochemistry in undifferentiated neoplasm/tumor of uncertain origin. ". Arch Pathol Lab Med 138 (12): 1583-610. doi: . PMID 25427040. Archived from the original. .
Image sources