Invasive ductal carcinoma

From patholines.org
Revision as of 09:51, 4 October 2019 by Mikael Häggström (talk | contribs) (despaced)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Author: Mikael Häggström [note 1]

Gross examination

Gross appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma.

As per:

or mastectomy.

Microscopic evaluation

Invasive ductal carcinoma, with occasional entrapped normal ducts (arrow).

Differential diagnosis

In invasive ductal carcinoma, malignant cells have penetrated the basement membrane, in contrast to ductal carcinoma in situ.

Staging

Stage by the TNM system as follows in sections below.

Also, look for any angiolymphatic invasion. If present, check whether it reaches outside the tumor, and if so, how far.[1] Give greatest dimension (,or 3 dimensions, generally by adding up the estimated thicknesses of involved slices)).[1]

Primary Tumor (T)

Tumor – Depends on the tumor at the primary site of origin, as follows:[2]

Measurements can be made by marking the tumor on microscopy, and then measuring between the markings, which may overlap between multiple slides as shown.
  • T1: Less than 2 cm
  • T1a: 0.1 to 0.5 cm
  • T1b: 0.5 to 1.0 cm
  • T1c: 1.0 to 2.0 cm
  • T2: 2 to 5 cm
  • T3: Larger than 5 cm
  • T4
  • T4a: Chest wall involvement
  • T4b: Skin involvement
  • T4c: Both 4a and 4b
  • T4d: Inflammatory breast cancer, a clinical circumstance where typical skin changes involve at least a third of the breast.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N)

Lymph Node: The lymph node values depend on the number, size and location of breast cancer cell deposits in various regional lymph nodes, such as the armpit (axillary lymph nodes), the collar area (supraclavicular lymph nodes), and inside the chest (internal mammary lymph nodes.)[3][4] Each stage is as follows:[2]

  • N0: There is some nuance to the official definitions for N0 disease, which includes:
  • N0(i+) : Isolated Tumor Cell clusters (ITC),[1] which are small clusters of cells not greater than 0.2 mm, or single tumor cells, or a cluster of fewer than 200 cells in a single histologic cross-section, whether detected by routine histology or immunohistochemistry;
  • N0(mol-): regional lymph nodes have no metastases histologically, but have positive molecular findings (RT-PCR).
  • N1: Mobile ipsilateral axillary nodes. Lymph node clusters 0.2 - 2.0 mm can be called "micrometastasis". At least one carcinoma focus over 2.0 mm is called "Lymph node metastasis". If one node qualifies as metastasis, count all other nodes even with smaller foci as metastases as well.[1]

Critical numbers of involved nodes: 1-3, 4-9, and 10 and over. Note any extranodal extension.[1]

  • N2: Fixed/matted ipsilateral axillary nodes.
  • N3
  • N3a – Ipsilateral infraclavicular nodes
  • N3b – Ipsilateral internal mammary nodes
  • N3c – Ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes

Distant Metastases (M)

  • M0: No clinical or radiographic evidence of distant metastases
  • M0(i+): Molecularly or microscopically detected tumor cells in circulating blood, bone marrow or non-regional nodal tissue, no larger than 0.2 mm, and without clinical or radiographic evidence or symptoms or signs of metastases, and which, perhaps counter-intuitively, does not change the stage grouping, as staging for in M0(i+) is done according to the T and N values
  • M1: Distant detectable metastases as determined by classic clinical and radiographic means, and/or metastasis that are histologically larger than 0.2 mm.

Overall stage

A combination of T, N and M, as follows:[2]

  • Stage 0: Tis
  • Stage I: T1N0
  • Stage II: T2N0, T3N0 T0N1, T1N1, or T2N1
  • Stage III: Invasion into skin and/or ribs, matted lymph nodes, T3N1, T0N2, T1N2, T2N2, T3N2, AnyT N3, T4 any N, locally advanced breast cancer
  • Stage IV: M1, advanced breast cancer
Further information: Evaluation of tumors

Template:Grading of breast cancer

Further information: Evaluation of tumors

Report

Breast excision

  • Tumor size, if not already given from gross report.[1] Give 3 dimensions or greatest dimension.[1]
  • Histopathologic subtype if apparent, but "invasive carcinoma" is acceptable.
  • Stage[1]
  • Grade, preferably by overall BRE grade. Optionally, give scores for the components thereof.[1]
  • Extent of any angiolymphatic invasion.[1]
  • Margins of resection,[1] as closest distance from carcinoma to margin in mm or cm or "tumor on ink"/"carcinoma is present on margin". ((If applicable, also specify as "close margins" (no tumor on ink but <2 mm), or "negative margins" (≥2 mm).))[5]
  • Results of any immunohistochemistry and other tests[1]
  • HER2 as a score or status.
  • Ki-67, preferably as labeling index

Example:

Breast excision with 70 x 55 x 18 mm ductal invasive breast cancer. Nottingham grade II. Estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor negative, HER2 receptor score 0, Ki-67 index 17%, T1b. Radically removed.


[5]

Needle or core biopsy

  • Histopathologic subtype if apparent, but "invasive carcinoma" is acceptable.
  • Results of any immunohistochemistry and other tests, as per excision[1]
  • Presence of absence of lymphatic and/or vascular invasion[1]
  • Optionally: Provisional grading. Grading can alternatively be deferred to excision.[1]
  • State if studies are deferred for a later excision sample[1]

For cancers, generally include a synoptic report, such as per College of American Pathologists (CAP) protocols at cap.org/protocols-and-guidelines.

synoptic report example
Tumor type:  invasive ductal carcinoma with micropapillary pattern
Tumor size:  greatest microscopic measurement of invasive carcinoma in positive core(s)):  0.7 cm
In-situ component: no
Microscopic grading (Nottingham modification of the Bloom-Richardson system):
  • Only applies to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinoma:  
Tubule formation: Little or none (score =3)
Nuclear pleomorphism: Marked variation in size, nucleoli, chromatin clumping, etc. (score =3)
Mitotic count : Less than 6 mitoses per 10 hpf (score =1)
Composite score: 7 points  (applies to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinoma only)
Histologic grade: Grade II: 6-7  points
Nuclear grade: grade 3
Microcalcifications: Present in non-neoplastic tissue
Lymphocytic host response: absent
Necrosis:  absent
Blood vessel invasion: absent
Histopathology of lymphatic invasion by carcinoma, H&E stain
Lymphatic and/or vascular invasion: absent
Skin involvement: not applicable
Results of immunohistochemical stains for prognostic markers (as per original report):
Estrogen Receptor (ER) Status:  Positive (greater than 10% of cells demonstrate nuclear positivity)
Percentage of Cells with Nuclear Positivity:  91-100%
Average Intensity of Staining:  Strong
Progesterone Receptor (PgR) Status:  Positive
Percentage of Cells with Nuclear Positivity:  51-60%
Average Intensity of Staining:  Strong, moderate and weak
HER-2 by IHC:  2+ / Equivocal
REFLEX HER-2 FISH TEST:  Nonamplificed (ratio 1.5;  3.5 Her-2 signals/cell)
Ki-67:
Percentage of Cells with Nuclear Positivity: 43%
Primary Antibody: MIB1
Cold Ischemia and Fixation Times: 3 minutes
Fixation Time (hours): 14 hours and 33 minutes
Fixative:  formalin

Notes

  1. For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Patholines:Authorship for details.

Main page

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 . Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast (Carcinoma of No Special Type). Stanford Medical School. Retrieved on 2019-10-02.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Originally copied from Fadi M. Alkabban; Troy Ferguson. Cancer, Breast. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Last Update: June 4, 2019. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  3. "Internal mammary lymphadenopathy in breast carcinoma: CT appraisal of anatomic distribution ". Radiology 167 (1): 89–91. April 1988. doi:10.1148/radiology.167.1.3347753. PMID 3347753. 
  4. "Internal mammary lymphadenopathy: imaging of a vital lymphatic pathway in breast cancer ". Radiographics 10 (5): 857–70. September 1990. doi:10.1148/radiographics.10.5.2217975. PMID 2217975. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Bundred JR, Michael S, Stuart B, Cutress RI, Beckmann K, Holleczek B (2022). "Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis. ". BMJ 378: e070346. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070346. PMID 36130770. PMC: 9490551. Archived from the original. . 

Image sources