Difference between revisions of "Template:Autopsy - comprehensiveness"

From patholines.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (spaced)
m (formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{if|{{{subsection|}}}
+
{{#if: {{{subsection|}}}
    |
+
  |  
 
===Comprehensiveness===
 
===Comprehensiveness===
|
+
  |  
 
==Comprehensiveness==
 
==Comprehensiveness==
|
 
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
==Comprehensiveness==
 
==Comprehensiveness==
 
Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:
 
Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:

Revision as of 08:36, 19 December 2019

Comprehensiveness

Comprehensiveness

Factors supporting a relatively more comprehensive autopsy and/or report, particularly in the inclusion of negated findings:

  • Lack of explanation from existing evidence. On the other hand, for example, upon finding an obvious aortic rupture, the rest of the autopsy is less relevant and may be relatively short.
  • Double-reading: If your report is likely to undergo double reading by another pathologist before sign-out, it needs to be more detailed, because the doctor who will do the double-reading then knows that you have looked at those locations.
  • Highly suspected locations, such as given from the referral.

In this page, the following signs and text coloring are used:

  • Minimal depth
  • (Moderate depth)
  • ((Comprehensive))