Evaluation: Difference between revisions
<noinclude> |
Measurement |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
File:Histopathology of mucosal plasma cell infiltrate in chronic gastritis.jpg|'''Plasma cells''' and '''lymphocytes''' generally confers a diagnosis of '''chronic inflammation''' if present in increased amount for the location. | File:Histopathology of mucosal plasma cell infiltrate in chronic gastritis.jpg|'''Plasma cells''' and '''lymphocytes''' generally confers a diagnosis of '''chronic inflammation''' if present in increased amount for the location. | ||
File:Histopathology of intravascular neutrophils.jpg|However, disregard intravascular white blood cells. | File:Histopathology of intravascular neutrophils.jpg|However, disregard intravascular white blood cells. | ||
</gallery> | |||
==Measuring distance== | |||
[[File:Calibration slide.jpg|thumb|210px|A calibration slide.]] | |||
In some cases, a structure is visible by directly looking at the microscopy slide, and if it is well-demarcated, a regular ruler can be used to measure it. Otherwise, you will generally need to make the measurement microscopically. For this purpose, you can use a calibration slide, which is basically a translucent ruler with 0.1 mm line resolution or smaller, which may cost about $15 if none of your colleagues has one to lend, or the department can't provide one for you. | |||
<gallery mode=packed heights=210> | |||
File:Measuring distance on a microscopy slide using a calibration slide.jpg|Measuring distance using a calibration slide, by putting the calibration slide on top of the tissue slide and switching focus between the two. | |||
File:Measurement of tumor size on two microscopy slides.jpg|Alternatively, use a marking pen to mark the limits under the microscopy, and then use a regular ruler to measure the dimensions, which may span more than one slide. | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==Counts per mm<sup>2</sup>== | ==Counts per mm<sup>2</sup>== | ||
There are multiple situations where a finding will be quantified in terms of amount per mm<sup>2</sup>. To make such calculations, you need to know the size of the area you see in the microscope. It is usually possible to look up what theoretically would be the area, but the most reliable way of knowing is to use a calibration slide | There are multiple situations where a finding will be quantified in terms of amount per mm<sup>2</sup>. To make such calculations, you need to know the size of the area you see in the microscope. It is usually possible to look up what theoretically would be the area, but the most reliable way of knowing is to use a calibration slide to measure the diameter of your view. The area is then calculated as: | ||
*Area in mm<sup>2</sup> ≈ (diameter in mm)<sup>2</sup> x 0.79 | *Area in mm<sup>2</sup> ≈ (diameter in mm)<sup>2</sup> x 0.79 | ||
<gallery mode=packed heights=220> | <gallery mode=packed heights=220> | ||
File:Micrograph of a calibration slide, showing the diameter of the field of view.jpg|Micrograph of a calibration slide, showing the diameter of the field of view. On this slide, each square is 0.05 mm wide, and each line represents 0.01 mm, making the diameter of the field of view 0.55 mm in this case (and thus an area of 0.24 mm<sup>2</sup>). | File:Micrograph of a calibration slide, showing the diameter of the field of view.jpg|Micrograph of a calibration slide, showing the diameter of the field of view. On this slide, each square is 0.05 mm wide, and each line represents 0.01 mm, making the diameter of the field of view 0.55 mm in this case (and thus an area of 0.24 mm<sup>2</sup>). | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 9 January 2022
Author:
Mikael Häggström [note 1]
Microscopy settings
Generally the condenser is placed in its highest position or just slightly lower. At low magnification objectives (mainly 4x and 10x objectives), the opening of the condenser (or iris) diaphragm should be wide open. For high-dry (40x) and oil-immersion objectives (100x), the diaphragm should be closed slowly while looking at a sharply focused section until the level of illumination is just slightly reduced, in order to attain optimal contrast and resolution.[1]
Low magnification has a greater span of focus compared to high magnification, so it is normal to need to focus if you're increasing magnification. However, if you find that you need to change focus even if going from high to low magnification, try the following (if you can adjust the eye piece):
- Use high magnification and focus on a specimen using the main focus knob.
- Switch to low magnification, and focus using the eye piece adjustment.
If there's a constant visual artifact, even after you've cleaned the eye piece and objective lenses with lens tissue, try raising or lowering the condenser if you can, and the artifact may disappear out of focus.
Main steps
- Preferably, look up past medical history of the patient, mainly past cancers that could possibly appear in the current specimen.
- Look at each microscopy slide by eye, to plan the microscopy screening so as to not miss peripheral fragments.
- Have a systematic direction of screening through microscopy slides, such as from top left to bottom right as seen in the microscope. When the microscope makes what you see two-way mirrored, the starting position is with the objective pointing at the bottom right of the glass slide.
-
Example starting position of objective.
-
Example slide scanning directions.
While learning, you will generally focus relatively more on high magnification features with high specificity, but still have a habit of learning how your cases look at low magnification as well. In time, you will increasingly correlate diseases and conditions with their overall low magnification patterns - patterns that may require 1000 words to describe and thus cannot conveniently be part of written criteria, but will nevertheless allow you to make quicker and more accurate diagnoses.
Artifacts
In microscopy, an artifact is an apparent structural detail that is caused by the processing of the specimen and is thus not a legitimate feature of the specimen. Major artifacts to account for include:
-
Cellulose contamination, here seen on H&E stain and polarized light, respectively.
-
Cardiac muscle (bottom) with contamination from thyroid tissue (center).
-
Crush artifact from compression by forceps on the tissue sample.
-
Folding artifacts (white arrows) and a crush artifact (black arrow, with cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia and nuclear pleomorphism) from a needle.
-
More tearing artifacts, showing that they may be more circular than fusiform.
-
'Formalin pigment artifacts
-
Air bubble entrapment artifacts
-
Staining artifacts by residual wax, resulting in pale areas where cellular structures are not discernible.
-
A separation artifact in top image makes the tumor look incompletely excised, but the next microtomy level (bottom image) shows a surgical margin of connective tissue.
Inflammation
-
Neutrophils generally confers a diagnosis of acute inflammation.
-
Plasma cells and lymphocytes generally confers a diagnosis of chronic inflammation if present in increased amount for the location.
-
However, disregard intravascular white blood cells.
Measuring distance
In some cases, a structure is visible by directly looking at the microscopy slide, and if it is well-demarcated, a regular ruler can be used to measure it. Otherwise, you will generally need to make the measurement microscopically. For this purpose, you can use a calibration slide, which is basically a translucent ruler with 0.1 mm line resolution or smaller, which may cost about $15 if none of your colleagues has one to lend, or the department can't provide one for you.
-
Measuring distance using a calibration slide, by putting the calibration slide on top of the tissue slide and switching focus between the two.
-
Alternatively, use a marking pen to mark the limits under the microscopy, and then use a regular ruler to measure the dimensions, which may span more than one slide.
Counts per mm2
There are multiple situations where a finding will be quantified in terms of amount per mm2. To make such calculations, you need to know the size of the area you see in the microscope. It is usually possible to look up what theoretically would be the area, but the most reliable way of knowing is to use a calibration slide to measure the diameter of your view. The area is then calculated as:
- Area in mm2 ≈ (diameter in mm)2 x 0.79
-
Micrograph of a calibration slide, showing the diameter of the field of view. On this slide, each square is 0.05 mm wide, and each line represents 0.01 mm, making the diameter of the field of view 0.55 mm in this case (and thus an area of 0.24 mm2).
Sometimes "high power field" (HPF) is used for area, but it has a substantially different area for different microscopes, for example:
| Microscope type | Area per HPF |
|---|---|
|
0.096 mm2 [3] |
| AO with 10x eyepiece | 0.12 mm2 [3] |
| Nikon Eclipse E400 with 10x eyepiece and 40x objective | 0.25 mm2 |
| Leitz Ortholux | 0.27 mm2 [3] |
| Leitz Diaplan | 0.31 mm2 [3] |
When your instructions are to count a specific number of HPFs, one HPF can be assumed to be 0.2 mm2.[4] If the view area in your microscope significantly differs from this area, calculate how many views you need to count as:
| Views = HPFs required x | 0.2 |
| Your microscope area (in mm2) |
For example, if your instruction is to count 10 HPFs and each view in your microscope shows 0.096 mm2, you should count in this many views:
| 10 x | 0.2 | ≈ 21 |
| 0.096 |
Subsequently, if your microscope area is significantly different from 0.2 mm2 and you need to state your result in terms of count/HPF, use:
| Count/HPF = Average count in your view x | 0.2 |
| Area of your view in mm2 |
For example, if you have counted an average of 10 cells (or other object of interest) in each of your views, and the area of your view is 0.096 mm2, then your count/HPF is:
| 10 x | 0.2 | ≈ 21 |
| 0.096 |
|
Further reading: |
Notes
- ↑ For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Patholines:Authorship for details.
Main page
References
- ↑ Patrice F Spitalnik. Histology Laboratory Manual, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons Columbia University. Retrieved on 2021-09-20.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Taqi, SyedAhmed; Sami, SyedAbdus; Sami, LateefBegum; Zaki, SyedAhmed (2018). "A review of artifacts in histopathology ". Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology 22 (2): 279. doi:. ISSN 0973-029X.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 . Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast (Carcinoma of No Special Type). Stanford University School of Medicine. Retrieved on 2019-10-02.
- ↑ Klimstra, David S.; Modlin, Irvin R.; Coppola, Domenico; Lloyd, Ricardo V.; Suster, Saul (2010). "The Pathologic Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors ". Pancreas 39 (6): 707–712. doi:. ISSN 0885-3177.
Image sources